Certification of a business record may substitute for in-court testimony for nonparties, as of 2014, without subpoenas, when the certification is sworn and signed by the custodian.

Study for the New York Law Course Exam. Engage with comprehensive questions, insightful explanations, and user-friendly flashcards. Perfect your knowledge and ace the NYLC!

Multiple Choice

Certification of a business record may substitute for in-court testimony for nonparties, as of 2014, without subpoenas, when the certification is sworn and signed by the custodian.

Explanation:
In New York, the business records exception lets a party prove the contents of a business record without the custodian testifying in court. Since around 2014, if the custodian signs a sworn certification attesting that the records were kept in the ordinary course of business and are accurate, that certification can substitute for in-court testimony for nonparties, and no subpoena is needed. The records themselves are admitted with the custodian’s sworn certification attached, and the court accepts them as evidence if the certification meets the required standards. This streamlines proof by allowing admissibility of the records through the sworn certification rather than through live testimony. It isn’t limited to party records, and it doesn’t require court approval beyond satisfying the certification requirements. So the statement about certification substituting for testimony under these conditions is correct.

In New York, the business records exception lets a party prove the contents of a business record without the custodian testifying in court. Since around 2014, if the custodian signs a sworn certification attesting that the records were kept in the ordinary course of business and are accurate, that certification can substitute for in-court testimony for nonparties, and no subpoena is needed. The records themselves are admitted with the custodian’s sworn certification attached, and the court accepts them as evidence if the certification meets the required standards. This streamlines proof by allowing admissibility of the records through the sworn certification rather than through live testimony. It isn’t limited to party records, and it doesn’t require court approval beyond satisfying the certification requirements. So the statement about certification substituting for testimony under these conditions is correct.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy