Spousal testimony and privilege: which is true?

Study for the New York Law Course Exam. Engage with comprehensive questions, insightful explanations, and user-friendly flashcards. Perfect your knowledge and ace the NYLC!

Multiple Choice

Spousal testimony and privilege: which is true?

Explanation:
Spousal privileges are not an all-or-nothing shield. There are protections specifically for confidential communications between spouses, made in the context of the marriage, which either spouse may invoke to prevent disclosure. Outside those confidential communications, there isn’t a blanket rule stopping a spouse from testifying about other matters. So the correct statement captures the idea that there is a privilege to protect confidential communications, while leaving room for the spouse to testify about non-confidential topics. The other options overstate or misstate the scope: there isn’t a universal ban on all testimony, and the privilege isn’t limited only to criminal cases.

Spousal privileges are not an all-or-nothing shield. There are protections specifically for confidential communications between spouses, made in the context of the marriage, which either spouse may invoke to prevent disclosure. Outside those confidential communications, there isn’t a blanket rule stopping a spouse from testifying about other matters. So the correct statement captures the idea that there is a privilege to protect confidential communications, while leaving room for the spouse to testify about non-confidential topics. The other options overstate or misstate the scope: there isn’t a universal ban on all testimony, and the privilege isn’t limited only to criminal cases.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy