Which of the following is true about an arbitrator in a New York arbitration?

Study for the New York Law Course Exam. Engage with comprehensive questions, insightful explanations, and user-friendly flashcards. Perfect your knowledge and ace the NYLC!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is true about an arbitrator in a New York arbitration?

Explanation:
In New York arbitration, the arbitrator acts as a neutral decision-maker who can conduct the hearing with a flexible, practical approach. The arbitrator may administer an oath to witnesses, listen to testimony, and admit evidence, while allowing the parties to be heard and to cross-examine witnesses. Parties may be represented by counsel to present their case. Importantly, the rules of evidence in arbitration are not the same as in a court trial, reflecting the more informal nature of arbitration while still aiming for a fair result. The decision is binding, but it can be reviewed by a court on limited grounds, so there is not no review at all. Witness testimony is allowed, so the option that forbids receiving any testimony is incorrect.

In New York arbitration, the arbitrator acts as a neutral decision-maker who can conduct the hearing with a flexible, practical approach. The arbitrator may administer an oath to witnesses, listen to testimony, and admit evidence, while allowing the parties to be heard and to cross-examine witnesses. Parties may be represented by counsel to present their case. Importantly, the rules of evidence in arbitration are not the same as in a court trial, reflecting the more informal nature of arbitration while still aiming for a fair result. The decision is binding, but it can be reviewed by a court on limited grounds, so there is not no review at all. Witness testimony is allowed, so the option that forbids receiving any testimony is incorrect.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy