Which of the following is NOT a per se defamation exception?

Study for the New York Law Course Exam. Engage with comprehensive questions, insightful explanations, and user-friendly flashcards. Perfect your knowledge and ace the NYLC!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is NOT a per se defamation exception?

Explanation:
Per se defamation means the statement is inherently harmful enough that the plaintiff need not prove actual damages. The classic categories are statements that accuse someone of a crime, those that impute a loathsome disease, and those that tend to injure the plaintiff’s business or professional reputation. In this question’s framing, the item describing imputing unchastity to a woman is not treated as a per se exception, so it does not automatically allow presumed damages. The other options clearly fit per se: charging someone with a serious crime, asserting a loathsome disease, or harming their business or professional standing.

Per se defamation means the statement is inherently harmful enough that the plaintiff need not prove actual damages. The classic categories are statements that accuse someone of a crime, those that impute a loathsome disease, and those that tend to injure the plaintiff’s business or professional reputation. In this question’s framing, the item describing imputing unchastity to a woman is not treated as a per se exception, so it does not automatically allow presumed damages. The other options clearly fit per se: charging someone with a serious crime, asserting a loathsome disease, or harming their business or professional standing.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy