Which situation qualifies as an exception to non-economic loss limitation due to grave injury?

Study for the New York Law Course Exam. Engage with comprehensive questions, insightful explanations, and user-friendly flashcards. Perfect your knowledge and ace the NYLC!

Multiple Choice

Which situation qualifies as an exception to non-economic loss limitation due to grave injury?

Explanation:
The rule being tested is that noneconomic damages have a cap, but there’s an exception when the injury is grave. A grave injury means a permanent and serious impairment, such as permanent loss of use of a body part or a permanent disfigurement. When an injury fits that definition, the noneconomic-damages limitation does not apply, allowing compensation beyond the standard cap for pain and suffering. A worker who sustains a grave injury clearly falls under this exception, since the injury is grave enough to meet the definition of permanent and significant impairment. The other injuries listed—an ordinary stubbed toe, a minor concussion, or a scratch on the arm—do not rise to the level of grave injury and thus remain subject to the cap.

The rule being tested is that noneconomic damages have a cap, but there’s an exception when the injury is grave. A grave injury means a permanent and serious impairment, such as permanent loss of use of a body part or a permanent disfigurement. When an injury fits that definition, the noneconomic-damages limitation does not apply, allowing compensation beyond the standard cap for pain and suffering.

A worker who sustains a grave injury clearly falls under this exception, since the injury is grave enough to meet the definition of permanent and significant impairment. The other injuries listed—an ordinary stubbed toe, a minor concussion, or a scratch on the arm—do not rise to the level of grave injury and thus remain subject to the cap.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy